Pedagogical Research

• Afandi, A., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development frameworks of the Indonesian partnership 21st-century skills standards for prospective science theachers: A Delphi study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647
• Akcan, E., & Başaran, M. (2022). Development of inquiry skills scale for life studies: Validity and reliability study. Pedagogical Research, 7(4), Article em0135. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12390
• Alanazi, F. H. (2023). Saudi students’ and science teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 57(1), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1884584
• Autade, R. H., Jadhav, R. M., Gaikar, P. S., Jori, D. B., Antre, S. H., & Reddy, P. G. (2015). Farmers perception, knowledge and attitude towards biotech (GM) crops at agrowon AgriExpo – A survey. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 8(3), 753-761. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2015.00083.2
• Bahri, N. M., Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2014). Students’ biotechnology literacy: The pillars of STEM education in Malaysia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1075a
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
• Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
• Carver, R. B., Castéra, J., Gericke, N., Alice, N., Evangelista, M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2017). Young adults’ belief in genetic determinism, and knowledge and attitudes towards modern genetics and genomics: The PUGGS questionnaire. PLoS ONE, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169808
• Casanoves, M., González, Á., Salvadó, Z., Haro, J., & Novo, M. (2015). Knowledge and attitudes towards biotechnology of elementary education preservice teachers: The first Spanish experience. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2923-2941. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1116718
• Castro, H. C., Serpa, F., Cavalcanti, A., Pereira, M., Paixao, I., Cisne, R., Fiaux, S. B., Campello, A. R., & Delou, C. M. (2017). Educational biotechnology: Teaching and developing for the future. Proceedings of the 21st World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (pp. 325-327).
• Çelikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2025). Development of a science cartoon-themed poster: Environmental sustainability. Pedagogical Research, 10(3), Article em0245. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/16807
• Chen, S.-Y., & Raffan, J. (1999). Biotechnology: Student’s knowledge and attitudes in the LJK and Taiwan. Journal of Biological Education, 34(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655678
• Cheung, G. W., Cooper‑Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41, 745-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
• Dawson, V. (2007). An exploration of high school (12-17 year old) students’ understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Research in Science Education, 37, 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9016-7
• de la Hoz, M. C., Solé‑Llussà, A., Harro, J., Gericke, N., & Valls, C. (2022). Student primary teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards biotechnology — Are they prepared to teach biotechnological literacy? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31, 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09942-z
• Erdoğan, M., Özel, M., BouJaoude, S., Lamanauskas, V., Uşak, M., & Prokop, P. (2012). Assessment of preservice teachers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(1), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/12.11.78
• Erdogan, M., Özel, M., Uşak, M., & Prokop, P. (2009). Development and validation of an instrument to measure University students’ biotechnology attitude. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9146-6
• Fırat, E. A., & Köksal, M. S. (2019a). Development and validation of the biotechnology literacy test. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(2), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21216
• Fırat, E. A., & Köksal, M. S. (2019b). Effects of instruction supported by Web 2.0 tools on prospective teachers’ biotechnology literacy. Computers & Education, 135, 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.018
• Firat, E. A., Çavuş, E., Gürbüz, G., T., & Öztürk, S. (2021). Biotechnology literacy inventory: Development, validity and reliability. Kastamonu Education Journal, 29(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.4155
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
• Hafte, L., & Jemal, K. (2023). Awareness, knowledge, and attitude of high school students toward modern biotechnology in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. SN Social Sciences, 3, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00580-9
• Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), Article 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
• Hanseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
• Hartono, A., Djulia, E., Hasruddin, H., & Jayanti, U. N. A. D. (2023). Biology students’ science literacy level on genetic concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39941
• Henneman, L., Vermeulen, E., van El, C. G., Claassen, L., Timmermans, D. R. M., & Cornel, M. C. (2012). Public attitudes towards genetic testing tevisited : Comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21, 793-799. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.271
• Hin, K. K., Yasin, R. M., & Amin, L. (2019). Systematic review of secondary school biotechnology teaching. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences, 3(2), 39-49.
• Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future: Building a curriculum for social activism. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(4), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.21.1.0361
• Hunaefi, D., Andrianto, M. S., Sukmawati, Y., & Muzzayyanah, P. N. (2023). Balinese perception on acceptance of biotechnology and GM crops. Proceedings of the Conference Towards ASEAN Chairmanship 2023 (T-A-C 23 2021), 198, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211207.023
• Jiang, B., & Wang, D. (2024). Perception of misinformation on social media among Chinese college students. Frontier in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416792
• Jiménez-Salas, Z., Campos-Góngora, E., González-Martínez, B. E., Tijerina-Sáenz, A., Escamilla-Méndez, A. D., & Ramírez-López, E. (2017). Basic-education mexican teachers’ knowledge of biotechnology and attitudes about the consumption of genetically modified foods*. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(5), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21058
• Kamizi, W. N. I. W., & Iksan, Z. H. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions and attitudes towards the science, technology and society approach in science teaching. Creative Education, 12(09), 2216-2227. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.129169
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
• Klop, T., & Severiens, S. E. (2007). An exploration of attitudes towards modern biotechnology: A study among Dutch secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 663-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600951556
• Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23, 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
• Leiva, A., Larrea-Sebal, A., Acha, A., & Montes, L. R. (2025). Impact of biotechnology on sustainable development: An opinion analysis. Sustainability, 17(22), Article 10023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210023
• Li, R.-Y., & Ma, Y.-Y. (2024). Knowledge and attitudes toward biotechnology in STEM education as an indicator of scientific literacy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.76
• Maat, H. (2014). Agriculture in Indonesia. In Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures (pp. 1-5). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_10229-1
• Malhotra, N. K. (2020). Marketing research: An applied orientation. Pearson Education.
• Martin, D. K., Vicente, O., Beccari, T., Kellermayer, M., Koller, M., Lal, R., Marks, R. S., Marova, I., Mechler, A., Tapaloaga, D., Žnidaršič-Plazl, P., & Dundar, M. (2021). A brief overview of global biotechnology. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 35(sup1), S5-S14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2021.1878933
• Mcneish, D. (2017). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412-433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
• Medani, K. R., Neill, A., Garrod, G., Ojo, M., & Hubbard, C. (2024). Societal perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) crops, feed, and food products in the Middle East, North Africa, and Turkey (MENAT) region: A systematic literature review. Food Quality and Preference, 117, Article 105148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105148
• Mujakir, M., Nurmalahayati, N., Safrijal, S., Salsabil, P., Fatma, E., & Zainuddin, Z. (2024). Efforts to improve scientific literacy capabilities in Indonesia: Systematic literature review. Online Learning in Educational Research, 4(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v4i1.395
• Murti, A. D., Hernani, & Fatimah, S. S. (2024). Analysis of Indonesian students scientific literacy ability in chemistry learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Learning Research, 2(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.62208/jelr.2.1.p.43-51
• Nascimento, A. P. S., & Barros, A. N. (2025). Sustainable innovations in food microbiology: Fermentation, biocontrol, and functional foods. Foods, 14(13), Article 2320. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132320
• Nawaz, U., Tariq, A., & Khan, A. S. (2025). Media framing of biotechnology and genetic engineering: Public perception vs. scientific reality. Social Sciences Review Archive, 3(4), 1634-1649. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i4.1259
• Nordqvist, O., & Johansson, S. (2020). Secondary school biology students’ attitudes towards modern biotechnology characterised using structural equation modeling. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), Article em1822. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115016
• Ntelok, Z. R. E., Resnasari, N. W. P., & Jamun, Y. M. (2022). Training students’ science literacy on biotechnology using science, environmental, technology, society (SETS) visioned learning instructional. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4925-4939. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.3002
• Nurlaely, N., Permanasari, A., & Riandi, R. (2017). Student’s STEM literacy in biotechnology learning at junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, Article 012155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012155
• OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills Education 2030.
• OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results: Factsheet-Indonesia.
• Özel, M. (2024). An analysis of research trends on socio-scientific issues in science education over two decades from 2004 to 2023. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.12973/jmste.1.1.69
• Öztürk-Akar, E. (2017). Turkish university students’ knowledge of biotechnology and attitudes toward biotechnological applications. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(2), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20996
• Paš, M., Vogrinc, J., Raspor, P., Kneževič, N. U., & Zajc, J. C. (2019). Biotechnology learning in Slovenian upper-secondary education: Gaining knowledge and forming attitudes. Research in Science and Technological Education, 37(1), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1491473
• Prokop, P., Lešková, A., Kubiatko, M., & Diran, C. (2007). Slovakian students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 895-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600969830
• Purbosari, P. P., & Ma’rifah, D. R. (2021). Knowledge and attitude of biology teacher candidate students towards genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 10(2), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v10i2.9173
• Ranjha, M. M. A. N., Shafique, B., Khalid, W., Nadeem, H. R., Mueen-ud-Din, G., & Khalid, M. Z. (2022). Applications of biotechnology in food and agriculture: A mini-review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences (Vol. 92, pp. 11-15). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-021-01320-4
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
• Savadori, L., Savio, S., Nicotra, E., Rumiati, R., Finucane, M., & Slovic, P. (2004). Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1289-1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00526.x
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural squation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
• Schrader, P. G., Kimberly, A., & Lawless, K. A. (2007). The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments. Performance Improvement, 43(9), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140430905
• Setiaji, B., Santoso, P. H., Aziz, K. N., Retnawati, H., & Khairudin, M. (2023). Using multilevel modeling to evaluate science literacy and technology course of the Indonesian non-science students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.06782
• Setiarto, R. H. B., Octaviana, S., Perwitasari, U., Juanssilfero, A. B., & Suprapedi, S. (2024). Development of functional bioflavor based on Indonesian indigenous microbial fermentation products. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 11(28), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-024-00242-6
• Sofia, H. W., Utomo, A. P., Hariyadi, S., & Wahono, B. (2020). The validity and effectivity of learning using STEAM module with biotechnology game. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10979
• Šorgo, A. (2012). Scientific creativity: The missing ingredient in Slovenian science education. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.1.2.127
• Sutrisna, N., & Anhar, A. (2020). An analysis of student’s scientific literacy skills of senior high school in Sungai Penuh City based on scientific competence and level of science literacy questions. Advances in Biological Sciences Research, 10, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.200807.032
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
• Toman, U. (2019). Articles on biotechnology teaching: Thematic content analysis study. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(4), 220-229. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v11i4.4271
• Torres, C. S., Velasco, M. T. H., Cadiz, M. C. H., & de Villa, R. R. M. (2006). Public understanding and perception of and attitude towards agricultural biotechnology in Indonesia. ISAAA & SEARCA.
• Unoma, C. R., & Menkiti, B. U. (2017). The role of educational awareness of biotechnology products and services in senior secondary schools in Enugu East local government area. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 2(3), 1192-1201. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.3.24
• Usak, M., Erdogan, M., Prokop, P., & Ozel, M. (2009). High school and university students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20267
• Volet, S., & Vauras, M. (2013). Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117736
• Yee, C. S., Zahia-Azizan, N. A., Rahim, M. H. A., Zaini, N. A. M., Raja-Razali, R., Ushidee-Radzi, M., Ilham, Z., & Wan-Mohtar, W. A. A. Q. I. (2025). Smart fermentation technologies: Microbial process control in traditional fermented foods. Fermentation, 11(6), Article 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060323
• Zhang, X., Chen, A., & Jin, J. (2026). Beyond risk-benefit perceptions: Social influence pathways in public attitudes toward genetic modification in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2025.2606000

APA

Hayati, N., Susilo, H., Ibrohim, I., & Balqis, B. (2026). Development of a biotechnology literacy instrument for undergraduate science students: Validity and reliability analysis using structural equation modeling. Pedagogical Research, 11(2), em0266. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/18608

Vancouver

Hayati N, Susilo H, Ibrohim I, Balqis B. Development of a biotechnology literacy instrument for undergraduate science students: Validity and reliability analysis using structural equation modeling. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2026;11(2):em0266. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/18608

AMA

Hayati N, Susilo H, Ibrohim I, Balqis B. Development of a biotechnology literacy instrument for undergraduate science students: Validity and reliability analysis using structural equation modeling. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2026;11(2), em0266. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/18608

Chicago

Hayati, Nur, Herawati Susilo, Ibrohim Ibrohim, and Balqis Balqis. "Development of a biotechnology literacy instrument for undergraduate science students: Validity and reliability analysis using structural equation modeling". Pedagogical Research 2026 11 no. 2 (2026): em0266. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/18608

Harvard

Hayati, N., Susilo, H., Ibrohim, I., and Balqis, B. (2026). Development of a biotechnology literacy instrument for undergraduate science students: Validity and reliability analysis using structural equation modeling. Pedagogical Research, 11(2), em0266. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/18608

MLA

Hayati, Nur et al. "Development of a biotechnology literacy instrument for undergraduate science students: Validity and reliability analysis using structural equation modeling". Pedagogical Research, vol. 11, no. 2, 2026, em0266. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/18608