Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Andrade, M. S. (2015). Effective eLearning and eTeaching—A theoretical model. In E-Learning-Instructional Design, Organizational Strategy and Management. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/60578
• Andrade, M. S. (2016, July). Distance learning: Making connections through social networking. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual European Conference on Social Media (pp. 9-18).
• Atan, H., Keong, F. K., Aris, B., Luan, W. S., Majid, O., & Rahman, Z. A. (2008). The Different Roles of Pedagogical Agents in the Open Source Learning Management System. Excellence in Education, 928-935.
• Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (Vol. 10). Pearson Education.
• Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302
• Coccoli, M., Guercio, A., Maresca, P., & Stanganelli, L. (2014). Smarter universities: A vision for the fast changing digital era. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 25(6), 1003-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.09.007
• Debeş, G., & Oznacar, B. (2018). Evaluation of the opinions of the manager, teacher, employees (secretary and servants) about school management of the digitalization and management processes of the system engineering model in education. Amazonia Investiga, 7(16), 243-253.
• Fallon, C., & Brown, S. (2016). E-learning standards: a guide to purchasing, developing, and deploying standards-conformant e-learning. CRC Press.
• Ghirardini, B. (2011). E-learning methodologies: A guide for designing and developing e-learning courses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
• Glover, I., Hepplestone, S., Parkin, H. J., Rodger, H., & Irwin, B. (2016). Pedagogy first: Realising technology enhanced learning by focusing on teaching practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12425
• Haelermans, C. (2017). Digital tools in education. On usage, effects, and the role of the teacher. SNS.
• Hauf, L. K. (2019). A Phenomenological Study Exploring Perceptions of the Net Generation and the Use of Visual Web 2.0 Tools in Online and On-Ground Classrooms (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).
• Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
• Hernandez, B., Montaner, T., Sese, F. J., & Urquizu, P. (2011). The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools?. Computers in human behavior, 27(6), 2224-2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.001
• Holmgren, R., Haake, U., & Söderström, T. (2017). Firefighter learning at a distance–a longitudinal study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 500-512. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12196
• Hu, P., & Zhang, J. (2017). A pathway to learner autonomy: A self-determination theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(1), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9468-z
• Ilomäki, L., & Lakkala, M. (2018). Digital technology and practices for school improvement: innovative digital school model. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0094-8
• Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Yu, Y., & Khan, S. U. (2017). Assessing the determinants of flow experience in the adoption of learning management systems: the moderating role of perceived institutional support. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(11), 1162-1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1362475
• Kryukov, V., & Gorin, A. (2017). Digital technologies as education innovation at universities. Australian Educational Computing, 32(1), 1-16.
• Lei, C. U., Wan, K., & Man, K. L. (2013). Developing a smart learning environment in universities via cyber-physical systems. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 583-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.075
• Lindqvist, M. H., & Pettersson, F. (2019). Digitalization and school leadership: on the complexity of leading for digitalization in school. The international journal of information and learning technology.
• Machekhina, O. N. (2017). Digitalization of education as a trend of its modernization and reforming. Revista Espacios, 38(40).
• Masters, J. (2018, October). Trends in the digitalization of K-12 schools: The Australian perspective. In Seminar. net (Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 120-131).
• Niculescu, G. (2019). The Digital Technologies In Education. Annals-Economy Series, 6, 86-91.
• Ordov, K., Madiyarova, A., Ermilov, V., Tovma, N., & Murzagulova, M. (2019). New trends in education as the aspect of digital technologies. Technology, 10(2), 1319-1330.
• Pettersson, F. (2020). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
• Pireva, K., Imran, A. S., & Dalipi, F. (2015, August). User behaviour analysis on LMS and MOOC. In 2015 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e) (pp. 21-26). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2015.7403480
• Rahman, A., Malaysia, N. A., Sairi, M. T. U. K., Zizi, I. K., & Khalid, F. (2020). The Importance of Cybersecurity Education in School. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(5), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.5.1393
• Rashida, M. F. (2018). Learning Management System (LMS) in higher education institutions. Journal of Information Systems & Information Technology (JISIT), 3(2), 15-23.
• Rodriguez-Brown, F. V., Li, R. F., & Albom, J. B. (1999). Hispanic Parents’ Awareness and Use of Literacy-Rich Environments at Home and in the Community. Education and Urban Society, 32(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124599032001003
• Ross, S. M. (2020). Technology infusion in K-12 classrooms: a retrospective look at three decades of challenges and advancements in research and practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09756-7
• Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Leony, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2015). ALAS-KA: A learning analytics extension for better understanding the learning process in the Khan Academy platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.002
• Sadaf, A., & Johnson, B. L. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about integrating digital literacy into classroom practice: An investigation based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1347534
• Saha, A., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016). Ranking OER providers in India: a webometric analysis. International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science, 6(1).
• Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174559-en
• Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 1006-1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229
• Sharma, S. (2019). Digital Competence of Teacher Educators with respect to Open Educational Resources. Journal of the Gujarat Research Society, 21(15), 1029-1051.
• Stepan, A. (2013). Massive open online courses (MOOC) Disruptive impact on higher education.
• Tang, S. (2016). Digital storytelling approach in a multimedia feature writing course. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 572-578. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0703.19
• Wang, Z., & Guo, J. (2017). Teaching and practice mode reform in digital image processing curriculum. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(7), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.7.930
• Yehya, F. (2019). Impact of Computer Simulation on Students’ Cognitive Achievement in Physics Courses. (Doctoral dissertation). Saint Joseph University, Beirut.
• Yehya, F. (2020). Promoting Technology- Implementation Learning paradigm for online learning in secondary Education. Global Journal of Information Technology: Emerging Technologies, 10(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjit.v10i1.4620
• Yehya, F., Barbar, A., & Rjeily, S. A. (2018). Diagnosing the barriers for integrating Educational Technology in Physics courses in Lebanese secondary schools. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 3(2), 14-39. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.03.02.2
• Yulia, Y., & Susilowati, I. (2020, January). Digitizing learning assessment to develop students’ critical thinking. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1456, No. 1, p. 012053). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012053

APA

Yehya, F. M. (2021). Promising Digital Schools: An Essential Need for an Educational Revolution. Pedagogical Research, 6(3), em0099. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11061

Vancouver

Yehya FM. Promising Digital Schools: An Essential Need for an Educational Revolution. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2021;6(3):em0099. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11061

AMA

Yehya FM. Promising Digital Schools: An Essential Need for an Educational Revolution. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2021;6(3), em0099. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11061

Chicago

Yehya, Fouad Mounier. "Promising Digital Schools: An Essential Need for an Educational Revolution". Pedagogical Research 2021 6 no. 3 (2021): em0099. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11061

Harvard

Yehya, F. M. (2021). Promising Digital Schools: An Essential Need for an Educational Revolution. Pedagogical Research, 6(3), em0099. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11061

MLA

Yehya, Fouad Mounier "Promising Digital Schools: An Essential Need for an Educational Revolution". Pedagogical Research, vol. 6, no. 3, 2021, em0099. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11061