Pedagogical Research

• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
• Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D. J., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. In J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education II (CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, Vol. 6, pp. 1-32). American Mathematical Society.
• Bautista, G., Jr., Tejera, M., Dana-Picard, T., & Lavicza, Z. (2023). Using DGS in investigating synchronised registers of representations of extrema problems. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v30.3.7
• Becta. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
• Brown, A., McDonald, M., & Weller, K. (2010). Step by step: Infinite iterative processes and actual infinity. In F. Hitt, D. Holton, & P. W. Thompson (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education VII (CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, Vol. 16, pp. 115-142). American Mathematical Society.
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01017.x
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-123). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_7
• Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 2. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(2), 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0473-0
• Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., & Arnon, I. (2013). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion: The case of 0.999… and 1. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(3), 232-258.
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
• Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Finzer, W., & Jackiw, N. (1998). Dynamic manipulation of mathematics objects. Key Curriculum Press.
• Fischbein, E. (2001). Tacit models and infinity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(2-3), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016088708705
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
• Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A “proceptual” view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 116-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/749505
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
• Hashemi, M., Azizinezhad, M., & Farokhi, M. (2012). PowerPoint as an innovative tool for teaching and learning in modern classes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 559-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.103
• Kaput, J. J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515-556). Macmillan.
• Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00018-X
• Nam, P. S., Linh, N. T., Tu, P. T. T., Lavicza, Z., & Bautista, Jr., G. P. (2024). PowerPoint as a tool to support the creation of dynamic models for teaching: The case of the sum of an infinite geometric sequence. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v31.3.03
• Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. K. (2004). Dynamic visualisations and learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 235-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.001
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Tall, D. O. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity and proof. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 495-511). Macmillan.
• Villabona, D., Roa-Fuentes, S., & Oktaç, A. (2022). Concepciones dinámicas y estáticas del infinito: Procesos continuos y sus totalidades. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 40(1), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3277
• Villabona, D., Oktaç, A., & Roa-Fuentes, S. (2024). Acting on totalities of infinite processes: Constructing facets of an object conception. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(7), 1375-1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01631-6
• Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2009). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150902817381

APA

Tu, P. T. T., Nam, P. S., Hau, N. H., & Van, N. T. (2026). From process to object: Scaffolding reification and proceptual fluency in infinite series with accessible dynamic visualizations. Pedagogical Research, 11(4), em0293. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/19625

Vancouver

Tu PTT, Nam PS, Hau NH, Van NT. From process to object: Scaffolding reification and proceptual fluency in infinite series with accessible dynamic visualizations. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2026;11(4):em0293. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/19625

AMA

Tu PTT, Nam PS, Hau NH, Van NT. From process to object: Scaffolding reification and proceptual fluency in infinite series with accessible dynamic visualizations. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2026;11(4), em0293. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/19625

Chicago

Tu, Pham Thi Thanh, Pham Sy Nam, Nguyen Huu Hau, and Nguyen Thuy Van. "From process to object: Scaffolding reification and proceptual fluency in infinite series with accessible dynamic visualizations". Pedagogical Research 2026 11 no. 4 (2026): em0293. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/19625

Harvard

Tu, P. T. T., Nam, P. S., Hau, N. H., and Van, N. T. (2026). From process to object: Scaffolding reification and proceptual fluency in infinite series with accessible dynamic visualizations. Pedagogical Research, 11(4), em0293. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/19625

MLA

Tu, Pham Thi Thanh et al. "From process to object: Scaffolding reification and proceptual fluency in infinite series with accessible dynamic visualizations". Pedagogical Research, vol. 11, no. 4, 2026, em0293. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/19625