Peer feedback versus teacher educators feedback in peer teaching: Zimbabwean teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ views

Gladys Sunzuma; Nicholas Zezekwa; Isaac Gwizangwe; Gracious Zinyeka

doi:10.29333/pr/12097

Full Text (PDF)

Gladys Sunzuma ¹ ^* , Nicholas Zezekwa ¹ , Isaac Gwizangwe ¹ , Gracious Zinyeka ¹

More Detail

¹ Bindura University of Science Education, Bindura, ZIMBABWE^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The study focuses on peer and teacher educators’ assessments in teacher education and the level of agreement between pre-service teachers’ and teacher educators’ assessments. The study employed a mixed-method approach using a lesson observation and assessment instrument and interviews to gather data. Seven conveniently sampled pre-service teachers and two teacher educators participated in this study. The findings showed statistically significant differences between pre-service teachers’ and teacher educators’ scores on ten items, and their scores were not statistically significant on five of the items. The pre-service teachers scored higher marks than the teacher educators. Their reasons for scoring higher marks were to maintain relationships and lack of content and pedagogical knowledge. Pre-service teachers need to know that peer teaching and assessment are meant for long-lasting learning instead of simply scoring marks.

Keywords

peer
peer teaching and assessment
pre-service teachers
teacher educators
peer feedback

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

PEDAGOGICAL RES, Volume 7, Issue 3, July 2022, Article No: em0130

https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12097

Publication date: 18 May 2022

Article Views: 1520

Article Downloads: 993

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Addler, J. (2004). Research and maths teacher education in ten years of SAARMSTE: Trends. In A. Buffler, & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Ten years of SAARMSTE: Trends and challenges (pp. 6-15). SAARMSTE.
Adu-Yeboah, C., & Yaw Kwaah, C. (2018). Preparing teacher trainees for field experience: Lessons from the on-campus practical experience in colleges of education in Ghana. SAGE Open, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018807619
Akyeampong, A. K., & Stephens, D. (2002). Exploring the backgrounds and shaping of beginning student teachers in Ghana: Toward greater contextualization of teacher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(01)00064-5
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Basturk, S. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of microteaching in mathematics of primary pre-service teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(5), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i5.1509
Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55, 735-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1
Chan, K. M. (2013). Peer assessment in mathematics lessons: An action research in an eighth grade class in Macau [Masters thesis, University of Hong Kong].
Darling-Hammond, L., & Stykes, G. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the highly qualified teacher challenge. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33), 1-57. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n33.2003
Falchikov, N. (2007). The place of peers in learning and assessment. In D. Boud, & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 128-143). Routledge.
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. SAGE.
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyyen, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 304-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
Hamer, J., Purchase, H. C., Denny, P., & Luxton-Reilly, A. (2009). Quality of peer assessment in CS1. In Proceedings of the 5^th International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp.27-36). https://doi.org/10.1145/1584322.1584327
Hamer, J., Purchase, H., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Denny, P. (2015). A comparison of peer and tutor feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.893418
Hendry, G. D., & Oliver, G. R. (2012). Seeing is believing: The benefits of peer observation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.9.1.7
Hendry, G. D., Bell, A., & Thomson, K. (2014). Learning by observing a peer’s teaching situation. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 318-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.848806
Izgar, G., & Akturk, A. O. (2018). A mixed-method research on peer assessment. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(2) 118-126. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i2.12770
Kilic, A. (2010). Learner-centred micro-teaching in teacher education. International Journal of Instruction, 3, 77-100.
Kilic, D. (2016). An examination of using self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment in higher education: A case study in teacher education. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n1p136
Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
Lonergran, N., & Anderson, L. W. (1988). Field-based education: Some theoretical consideration. Higher Education Research & Development, 7, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436880070106
Manchishi, C., & Mwanza, D. S. (2016). Teacher preparation at the University of Zambia: Is peer teaching still a useful srategy? International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 3(11), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0311012
Mashava, R., & Chingombe, A. (2013). Teaching practice and the quality dilemma: Lessons from experiences of student teachers in Masvingo Province. Africa Education Review, 10(sup1), S134-S148. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2013.855439
Mavhundutse, O. (2012). Stress antecedents among student teachers. The Zimbabwean Bulletin of Teacher Education, 13.
Mulkeen, A. (2010). Teachers in Anglophone Africa–Issues in teacher supply, training and management. Development practice in education. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8053-6
Nziramasanga, C. T. (1999). Report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into education and training, Zimbabwe: Government printers. https://ir.uz.ac.zw/handle/10646/1191
Omar, S. N., Shahrill, M., & Sajali, M. Z. (2018). The use of peer assessment to improve students’ learning of geometry. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 5(2), 107-206. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejser-2018-0047
Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.656077
Parr, G., Wilson, J., Godinho, S., & Longaretti, L. (2004). Improving pre-service teacher learning through peer teaching: Process, people and product. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12, 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126042000239938
Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ text of varying quality. Instructional Science, 43(5), 591-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x
Sen, A. I. (2010). Effects of peer teaching and microteaching on teaching skills of pre-service physics teachers. Education and Science, 35(155), 78-88.
Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(16), 631-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172

How to cite this article

APA

Sunzuma, G., Zezekwa, N., Gwizangwe, I., & Zinyeka, G. (2022). Peer feedback versus teacher educators feedback in peer teaching: Zimbabwean teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ views. Pedagogical Research, 7(3), em0130. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12097

Vancouver

Sunzuma G, Zezekwa N, Gwizangwe I, Zinyeka G. Peer feedback versus teacher educators feedback in peer teaching: Zimbabwean teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ views. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2022;7(3):em0130. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12097

AMA

Sunzuma G, Zezekwa N, Gwizangwe I, Zinyeka G. Peer feedback versus teacher educators feedback in peer teaching: Zimbabwean teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ views. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2022;7(3), em0130. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12097

Chicago

Sunzuma, Gladys, Nicholas Zezekwa, Isaac Gwizangwe, and Gracious Zinyeka. "Peer feedback versus teacher educators feedback in peer teaching: Zimbabwean teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ views". Pedagogical Research 2022 7 no. 3 (2022): em0130. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12097

Harvard

Sunzuma, G., Zezekwa, N., Gwizangwe, I., and Zinyeka, G. (2022). Peer feedback versus teacher educators feedback in peer teaching: Zimbabwean teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ views. Pedagogical Research, 7(3), em0130. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12097

MLA

Sunzuma, Gladys et al. "Peer feedback versus teacher educators feedback in peer teaching: Zimbabwean teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ views". Pedagogical Research, vol. 7, no. 3, 2022, em0130. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12097